Selexipag Dosing Strategies for Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

This retrospective chart review of patients less than 18 years old with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) receiving selexipag was conducted to describe selexipag dosing practices, impact on concomitant PAH therapies, and the safety and efficacy of selexipag. Twenty-seven patients aged 1-17 years started a median dose of oral selexipag 100 µg twice daily. Therapy was increased by a median of 100 µg twice daily every 6 days to a maximally tolerated median dose of 800 µg twice daily. All 24 patients on another prostacyclin derivative were able to discontinue therapy at their maximum tolerated selexipag dose; other concomitant PAH therapies did not change. Changes in echocardiogram data and 6-MWT results were variable. No patients discontinued selexipag; four patients received decreased doses due to flushing (n = 1), drug interactions (n = 2), or increased frequency of nose bleeds (n = 1).

Direct prostacyclin transition in pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are commonly treated with the prostacyclin analog treprostinil in IV, SQ, inhaled or oral form, or the prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag. Patients who transition between these medications often follow recommendations for gradual up- and down-titrations that take place over several days in the hospital or several weeks as an outpatient. However, hospital resources are limited, and long transitions are inconvenient for patients and families. We report a case series of eight pediatric patients with PAH transitioned directly between prostacyclins with no overlapping doses. Direct medication transitions occurred in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), at home and in cardiology clinic. Equivalent doses for selexipag were estimated using information extrapolated from experience, published materials and selexipag study guidelines. All patients completed direct transition as planned and remained on transition dose for at least 1 week. In most cases selexipag was up-titrated at home after establishing initial transition dose. In select patients, direct prostacyclin transition in pediatric patients with PAH is safe, effective, convenient for families and reduces the use of hospital resources.

Impact of different sequential triple oral combination therapies based selexipag on outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: While the GRIPHON study and others have confirmed the efficacy and safety of selexipag with single, dual, and initial triple combination therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), multicenters studies concerning diverse triple oral combination therapies based on selexipag are limited. HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of various sequential triple oral combination therapies on PAH outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out involving 192 patients from 10 centers, who were receiving sequential triple oral combination therapy consisting of an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i)/riociguat and selexipag. Clinical parameters, event-free survival, and all-cause survival were assessed and analyzed at baseline and posttreatment. RESULTS: Among the 192 patients, 37 were treated with ERA + riociguat + selexipag, and 155 patients received ERA + PDE5i + selexipag. Both sequential triple oral combination therapies improved the World Health Organization functional class and raised the count of low-risk parameters. As a result of the larger patients' population in the ERA + PDE5i + selexipag group, these individuals exhibited significant increases in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, right ventricle, and eccentricity index, and significant decreases in N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide after 6 months of treatment. Nevertheless, both sequential triple oral combination therapy groups demonstrated similar shifts in these clinical parameters between baseline and 6 months. Baseline 6MWD and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were independent predictors of survival in patients undergoing ERA + PDE5i + selexipag therapy. Importantly, no significant differences were found in 6-month event-free survival and all-cause survival between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Different oral sequential triple combination therapies based on selexipag could comparably improve outcomes in patients with PAH.

Disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with selexipag in real-world settings from the SPHERE registry (SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry).

BACKGROUND: Selexipag is an oral prostacyclin receptor agonist, indicated for pulmonary arterial hypertension to delay disease progression and reduce the risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension-related hospitalization. SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry (NCT03278002) was a US-based, prospective, real-world registry of selexipag-treated patients. METHODS: Adults with pulmonary hypertension (enrolled 2016-2020) prescribed selexipag were followed for ≤18 months, with data collected at routine clinic visits. Patients were defined as newly or previously initiated if they had started selexipag ≤60 days or >60 days, respectively, before enrollment. RESULTS: The registry included 829 patients (430 newly initiated, 399 previously initiated; 759 with pulmonary arterial hypertension), of whom 55.6% were World Health Organization functional class (FC) 3/4; 57.3% were intermediate or high risk per Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0. In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, 18-month discontinuation rates for adverse events were 22.0%, 32.0%, and 11.9%, and 18-month survival rates were 89.4%, 84.2%, and 94.5% in the overall, newly, and previously initiated patient populations, respectively. From baseline to month 18, most patients had stable or improved FC and stable or improved REVEAL 2.0 risk category status. Discontinuation for adverse events, hospitalization, and survival were similar regardless of patients' individually tolerated selexipag maintenance dose. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis of patients initiating selexipag, most patients had stable or improved FC and REVEAL 2.0 risk category. Similar to the GRIPHON trial, outcomes with selexipag in this real-world study were comparable across maintenance dose strata, with no new safety signals.

Selexipag for the Treatment of Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the safety, dosing regimen, and efficacy of selexipag for pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: A literature search of the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from inception through February 28, 2023. Two reviewers independently searched and evaluated the quality of the studies and pooled data when appropriate. Full-text articles of studies of children diagnosed with PH and treated with selexipag were eligible. Pediatric patients with PH were classified into 2 groups: the add-on therapy group, in which selexipag was used as a third therapy in addition to the baseline treatment, and the transition therapy group, in which patients were switched from parenteral prostacyclin analogs to selexipag. FINDINGS: Fourteen studies involving 58 pediatric patients with PH were included. All studies were either case reports or case series. Overall, 30 and 28 patients were in the add-on and transition therapy groups, respectively. In both groups, selexipag was initially administered as 50-200 µg twice daily and titrated to a tolerated dosage of 200-1,600 µg twice daily. Prostacyclin analogs were simultaneously weaned for patients in the transition group. In the add-on therapy group, 16 patients (80.0%) were at low risk of the World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC I/II), 12 (76.9%) were at low risk of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD; >350 m), and 21 (95.5%) were at low risk of the pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRi; <20 WU/m2). Furthermore, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were significantly improved. More than 70% of patients experienced common tolerable side effects, such as headache, nausea, and diarrhea. In the transition therapy group, 5 patients (55.6%) were at low risk according to WHO FC I/II, 6 (66.7%) were at low risk according to 6MWD, and 14 (87.5) were at low risk according to PVRi; however, selexipag had no significant effect on their hemodynamic parameters. Additionally, more than 80% of patients experienced no side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Selexipag as add-on therapy or for transition from prostacyclin analogs may have a favorable safety profile and potential efficacy for pediatric patients with PH. Further high-quality evidence of the efficacy and safety of selexipag for the treatment of pediatric PH is warranted.

Use of the National Cancer Institute Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess treatment tolerability in pulmonary arterial hypertension: qualitative patient research findings in current and former users of oral selexipag.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patients' perspectives regarding drug tolerability, in addition to effectiveness, provides a complete picture of the patient experience and supports more informed therapeutic decision-making. The item library of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to measure patient-reported frequency, severity, and interference of adverse events (AEs) associated with cancer therapies. This qualitative interview study assessed the suitability of items selected from the PRO-CTCAE library for assessing tolerability of selexipag, a medication targeting the prostacyclin pathway for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: Two rounds of 10 qualitative, web-assisted telephone interviews following a semi-structured guide were conducted in individuals with recent experience taking oral selexipag for PAH. Each interview included concept elicitation to gather participants' perspectives on symptomatic AEs (type, frequency, severity, and interference) and cognitive debriefing of PRO-CTCAE items addressing the most frequently reported AEs of oral selexipag. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 20 participants with PAH (mean [range] age 50 [24-68] years; 75% female; 85% in World Health Organization Functional Class II-III), comprising different races/ethnicities, levels of education, and employment status. Fifteen participants were currently treated with selexipag; five had taken selexipag for ≥ 6 months before discontinuing. The most frequently reported AEs included headache, jaw pain, and nausea (n = 15, 12, and 10 participants, respectively). Diarrhea and headache were identified as the most bothersome AEs by 5 and 4 participants, respectively. Some AEs were transitory (e.g., jaw pain); others were long-lasting (e.g., muscle pain). Based on findings from Round 1 interviews, a flushing item was added and the PRO-CTCAE general pain item was modified to be specific to jaw pain for testing in Round 2. Interview findings identified the following AEs as relevant to assess in a PAH clinical trial: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, flushing, jaw pain, headache, aching muscles, and aching joints. CONCLUSIONS: The PRO-CTCAE items selected in this study and the additional symptomatic AEs identified as patient-relevant have the potential to be included in assessments capturing the patient perspective on tolerability in future studies of selexipag and possibly other PAH therapies.

Comparative effectiveness of oral therapies targeting the prostacyclin pathway in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral prostanoids are recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and a unsatisfactory response to first-line therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness of oral therapies targeting the prostacyclin pathway in PAH patients. METHODS: An online search of Medline, Cochrane Registry, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 12020) was performed. Eight randomized controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 3023 patients, of whom 828 receiving oral treprostinil, 607 patients receiving selexipag, 125 patients receiving beraprost, and 1463 patients received placebo. RESULTS: As compared to placebo, oral treprostinil (WMD 9.05, 95% CI 3.0280-15.0839, p = 0.0032) and beraprost (WMD 21.98, 95% CI 5.0536-38.9063, p = 0.0109) arms significantly increased 6 min walking distance (6MWD) at follow-up from baseline, whereas selexipag use was associated with a non-significant increase in 6MWD (WMD 15.41, 95% CI -0.6074; 31.4232, p = 0.0593). Compared to placebo, the risk of clinical worsening was significantly lowered by selexipag (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65, p < 0.001) and oral treprostinil (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.90, p 0.012), whereas a non-significant reduction of the outcome was related to beraprost use (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36-1.38, p 0.31). No significant difference in 6MWD change and clinical worsening reduction were found among oral treprostinil and selexipag. Beraprost use less frequently caused adverse events as compared to selexipag and oral treprostinil. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in 6MWD change, clinical worsening reduction and adverse events rates were found among oral treprostinil and selexipag, resulting in similar efficacy and safety profile.

A real-world analysis of safety profile of selexipag by using FDA adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: The current investigation sought to conduct a real-world analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with selexipag by utilizing data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: The Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and the Medicines Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method were employed to assess the potential associations between selexipag and AEs. Case reports of adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to selexipag were systematically sourced from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Our analysis identified 281 Preferred Terms (PTs) signals across 20 System Organ Classes (SOCs) were found to meet the screening threshold. The most common AEs were consistent with instructions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and case reports. Of significant note, unexpected AEs principally target SOCs of infections and infestations, blood and lymphatic system, renal and urinary disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, including pneumonia, metapneumovirus, decreased hemoglobin. transfusion, iron-deficiency anemia, dialysis hypotension, abnormal creatinine renal clearance, liver function test increased, hepatic function abnormal, hepatic enzyme increased. Within the pediatric population, unexpected signals such as pyrexia, pneumonia, and intussusception necessitate special precautionary measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings contribute valuable insights to clinical practice, reinforcing the importance of vigilant monitoring, and can be instrumental in guiding both therapeutic applications and safety assessments of this particular medication.

Impact of selexipag use within 12 months of pulmonary arterial hypertension diagnosis on hospitalizations and medical costs: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Oral selexipag, a prostacyclin pathway agent (PPA), is effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of initiating oral selexipag within 12 months of diagnosis on health outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. PAH patients between 1 October 2015 and 30 September 2019 were included. Patients were also required to have received PAH medication within 12 months of their initial diagnosis. Study groups included patients who initiated selexipag within 12 months of PAH diagnosis (SEL ≤ 12) and those who did not initiate any PPA within 12 months of PAH diagnosis (No PPA ≤ 12). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to remove potential confounding between groups. Cox and Poisson regression models were used to compare hospitalization and disease progression. Generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link was used to compare costs. RESULTS: SEL ≤ 12 had lower rate of all-cause hospitalizations (rate ratio: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 0.96) versus no PPA ≤ 12, but no differences in PAH-related hospitalization rate (rate ratio: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.33) or risk of disease progression (hazard ratio: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.44). SEL ≤ 12 incurred lower all-cause (mean difference: -$23 623; 95% CI: -35 537, -8512) and PAH-related total medical costs (mean difference: -$12 927; 95% CI: -19 559, -5679) versus no PPA ≤ 12. CONCLUSION: Selexipag initiation within 12 months of PAH diagnosis demonstrated reductions in all-cause hospitalization rate and medical costs.

Corrigendum: Case report: Selexipag in pediatric pulmonary hypertension: initiation, transition, and titration.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1050508.].

Cost-effectiveness analysis of selexipag for the combined treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Objective: Adding selexipag to the combined treatment of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) reduces the risk of clinical worsening events in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) but at a considerably higher cost. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of adding selexipag to the combined treatment of ERA and PDE5i in patients with PAH from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. Methods: A Markov model was developed to assess costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of macitentan + tadalafil + selexipag vs. macitentan + tadalafil for the treatment of PAH. Markov states included WHO Functional Class (FC) (I-IV) and death. Transition probabilities were based on data from the TRITON trial. Mortality rates, costs, and utilities were obtained from published literature and public databases. Results: In the base case analysis, compared with macitentan + tadalafil, selexipag + macitentan + tadalafil increased costs ($357,807.588 vs. $116,534.543, respectively) and QALYs (7.234 QALYs vs. 6.666 QALYs, respectively). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $424,746.070 per QALY, which was higher than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $38,223.339 per QALY. The results were most sensitive to HR for mortality of patients with FC IV relative to the general population, discount rate, and the cost of selexipag. The probability was greater than 50% for the selexipag + macitentan + tadalafil only if the WTP was more significant than $426,019.200 per QALY. Conclusion: In China, adding selexipag may not be cost-effective for patients with PAH who failed to control their condition after combined treatment of ERA and PDE5i. Results of the analysis can aid discussions on the value and position of selexipag for the combined treatment of PAH.

The use of selexipag, a prostacyclin receptor analog, for treatment of severe pulmonary artery hypertension during pregnancy, a case report.

Pregnancy in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Despite the risks, more patients with PAH are becoming pregnant. Case reports and case series have described the use of IV epoprostenol in these patients with some success. However, there are no published reports regarding the use of oral prostacyclins and prostacyclin receptor agonists in pregnancy. We describe the use of selexipag, an oral prostacyclin receptor agonist, for treating severe PAH during pregnancy in a patient who refused IV prostacyclin therapy. She remained stable throughout pregnancy and delivered a healthy baby girl; however, she died 13 days after her delivery by cesarean section due to developing worsening heart failure. While there is data and support for IV prostacyclins in pregnancy, patients may opt for oral formulations, like in our case. Registry data on the use of oral prostacyclins and prostacyclin receptor agonists in pregnancy may help improve patient outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of transitioning from selexipag to oral treprostinil in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Findings from the ADAPT registry.

PURPOSE: Oral treprostinil and selexipag are drugs targeting the prostacyclin pathway and are approved for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the setting of unsatisfactory clinical response or tolerability issues while on selexipag, there is little data on clinical benefit, safety, or strategies on transitioning to oral treprostinil. Using prospective data from the ADAPT registry, we aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, safety, and transition strategies in ten patients with PAH transitioning from selexipag to oral treprostinil. METHODS: ADAPT was a prospective, real-world, multicenter, United States-based registry of patients with PAH newly started on oral treprostinil, with a cohort of patients (n = 10) transitioning from selexipag to oral treprostinil. PAH variables of interest were collected from standard-of-care clinic visits. Clinical improvement was defined by modified REPLACE criterion, and risk was assessed by REVEAL Lite 2 from baseline to last follow-up. Real world transition strategies were recorded. Healthcare utilization or worsening PAH was evaluated within 30 days of transitions. RESULTS: Seven patients transitioned due to worsening PAH or lack of efficacy on selexipag, and three patients transitioned due to tolerability issues. Based on the modified REPLACE criterion, five patients demonstrated clinical improvement after transition from selexipag to oral treprostinil. Using REVEAL Lite 2 to assess risk, three patients improved and five patients maintained risk category from baseline to last follow-up. All transitions occurred in an outpatient setting either as abrupt stop/start or cross-titration, without parenteral treprostinil bridging. CONCLUSION: Transition from selexipag to oral treprostinil was safe, performed without parenteral prostacyclin bridging, and resulted in clinical and categorical risk improvements in some patients.

Transitioning intravenous epoprostenol to oral selexipag in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a case report.

Intravenous (i.v.) prostacyclin is the cornerstone treatment in high-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. Selexipag is an orally available prostacyclin receptor agonist. Limited data are available regarding the feasibility of transitioning from i.v. epoprostenol to selexipag. A 50-year-old woman with idiopathic PAH was diagnosed in a World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC) IV. She improved with upfront triple combination therapy, including i.v. epoprostenol. Over 2 years of follow-up, the patient remained at low risk and expressed strong preference towards oral therapies. After careful risk-benefit clinical consideration, she was transitioned from i.v. epoprostenol to selexipag. Selexipag was started at dosage of 200 µg twice daily (b.i.d.) and titrated up to 1600 µg b.i.d. over 8 weeks (up-titration of 200 µg b.i.d. every week). Simultaneously, i.v. epoprostenol was down-titrated 3.0 ng/kg/min every week from a dosage of 27.5 ng/kg/min. The transition occurred under strict medical surveillance and was well tolerated. One year after discontinuation of epoprostenol, the patient remains in WHO FC I and has no signs of clinical deterioration. Although not generalizable to most PAH patients, this case highlights that a carefully planned transition from epoprostenol to selexipag is feasible in selected low-risk patients within a shared medical decision-making framework.

Preliminary Clinical and Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis Data on Selexipag Efficacy for the Treatment of Digital Vasculopathy in Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is burdened by Raynaud phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DUs), and sometimes standard vasoactive therapies are ineffective or contraindicated. Selexipag is an oral selective IP prostacyclin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of SSc-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and instrumental efficacy of selexipag in SSc digital vasculopathy. METHODS: Patients with SSc with severe digital vasculopathy refractory or with contraindication to all other vasoactive therapies were administered selexipag. RP- and DU-related clinical outcomes were evaluated, and digital perfusion was assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA), all at baseline and after 3 months. RESULTS: Selexipag was administered to 9 patients with SSc (66.6% female, mean age 52.3 [SD 16.6] yrs). One patient had to stop the drug because of adverse effects. After 3 months of selexipag administration, there was a significant reduction in RP daily episodes (P = 0.01) and RP mean duration (P = 0.04). The number of DUs decreased from 10 to 4 without reaching statistical significance. A significant improvement in mean perfusion of the fingers (P = 0.02) was observed with LASCA. CONCLUSION: Selexipag showed good potential for the treatment of SSc digital vasculopathy. Our results are certainly preliminary, yet quite encouraging. New trials for the evaluation of selexipag efficacy in SSc digital vasculopathy are needed.

Comparative evaluation of costs and healthcare resource utilization of oral selexipag versus inhaled treprostinil or oral treprostinil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a rare vasculopathy progressively leading to right heart failure and death, is associated with considerable economic burden. Oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs) like selexipag and treprostinil address an underlying PAH pathway, yet are often under-utilized. Data on head-to-head cost comparison of various PPAs is lacking. METHODS: In this retrospective study using a large health claims database, we compared the per-patient-per-year (PPPY) costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among PAH patients taking either oral selexipag, inhaled treprostinil or oral treprostinil in the United States between July 2015 and March 2020. Patients with ≥1 prescription for one of the drugs of interest, ≥1 in-patient pulmonary hypertension (PH) diagnosis, or ≥ 2 outpatient PH diagnoses were included in this study. Baseline differences between the three groups were adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach. 411 patients were selected for the final study cohorts. RESULTS: All-cause hospitalization costs were highest for oral treprostinil ($39,983) compared to oral selexipag ($20,635) and inhaled treprostinil ($16,548; p = .037). Total PAH-related medical costs were 40% lower for patients on oral selexipag compared to patients on oral and inhaled treprostinil ($24,351 vs. $40,398 and $40,339, respectively; p = .006). PAH-related outpatient visits were lowest for patients on oral selexipag (14 PPPY visits) compared to oral treprostinil (16 PPPY visits) and inhaled treprostinil (22 PPPY visits; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to oral and inhaled treprostinil, oral selexipag may incur lower medical costs and reduce PAH related outpatient visits for patients with PAH.

Case Report: Selexipag in pediatric pulmonary hypertension: Initiation, transition, and titration.

Selexipag, a selective prostacyclin receptor agonist, is approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension in WHO Group 1 adult patients. Compared to parenteral prostacyclin formulations, selexipag offers a significant improvement in patient's and caregiver's quality of life because of its oral formulation, frequency of administration, and mechanism of action. Although experience in the pediatric population is limited to case reports in older adolescent patients and selexipag is not approved for use in the pediatric pulmonary hypertension population, many pediatric centers are expanding the use of this therapy to this population. We report our institution's experience in the use of selexipag to treat pulmonary hypertension in children under 10 years of age, between 10 and 30 kg. Seven patients were initiated on selexipag therapy including de novo initiation and transition from intravenous treprostinil to oral selexipag. All patients were on stable background therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor and endothelin receptor antagonist therapies at baseline. All patients reached their planned goal selexipag dose during admission without the need for changes to the titration schedule and without hemodynamic deterioration. In our experience, oral selexipag is safe and well-tolerated in young pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension. Based on our favorable experience, we developed an institution-specific selexipag process algorithm for continued successful use in the pediatric population.

Hospitalization Among Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients With and Without Connective Tissue Disease Comorbidities Prescribed Oral Selexipag.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have a poorer prognosis than those with other PAH etiologies. This study assessed the impact of CTD on healthcare outcomes among PAH patients with and without CTD comorbidities that were treated with oral selexipag. METHODS: The study utilized Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (2007-2021) from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019, and identified patients with PAH without CTD and PAH with CTD treated with oral selexipag. Patients had ≥ 12-month baseline period with no requirement for a minimum follow-up period. Patients were followed until any of the following events: discontinuation of oral selexipag, or health plan disenrollment, or death, or presence of a diagnosis claim for CTEPH, or study end date, whichever occurred first. PAH-related hospitalizations, PAH disease progression, and healthcare utilizations and costs were assessed in the follow-up period. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the time to hospitalization and generalized linear models were used to examine healthcare costs and utilization between the two cohorts. RESULTS: In the analysis, 237 PAH without CTD, and 80 PAH patients with CTD comorbidities prescribed oral selexipag were included. The PAH without CTD comorbidities cohort was older (65 vs. 63 years old), had proportionately less females (72 vs. 83%), and higher comorbidity burden than PAH with CTD comorbidities (mean CCI index 3 vs. 2). After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk for PAH-related hospitalization (hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, p value 0.641), all-cause hospitalization (HR 1.09, p value: 0.765), and PAH disease progression (HR 1.14, p value 0.522) between the two cohorts were similar. After adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, PAH with CTD comorbidities incurred higher total mean all-cause PAH-related medical care costs compared to PAH without CTD comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, the risk of hospitalization and PAH disease progression were similar between the two cohorts who received oral selexipag. The results from this study corroborate findings of the GRIPHON post hoc analysis of PAH-associated CTD patients and support oral selexipag use in PAH-CTD patients.

Assessing Daily Life Physical Activity by Actigraphy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights From the Randomized Controlled Study With Selexipag (TRACE).

BACKGROUND: Reduced daily life physical activity (DLPA) in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) contributes to a poor quality of life. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can actigraphy be used to assess changes in DLPA in patients with PAH receiving selexipag or placebo? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Effect of Selexipag on Daily Life Physical Activity of Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (TRACE) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, exploratory phase 4 study enrolling patients with PAH in World Health Organization functional class II/III, receiving stable endothelin receptor antagonist with/without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor background therapy. Primary end points were change from baseline to Week 24 in actigraphy-assessed DLPA (recorded by using an accelerometer), including daily time spent in nonsedentary physical activity (NSPA), daily time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), daily volume of activity, and daily number of steps. RESULTS: At baseline, patients (N = 108) were prevalent, on stable background PAH therapy, and at low risk of disease progression. Patients showed high compliance with wear of the accelerometer throughout the study. From baseline to Week 24, mean daily time spent in NSPA increased by 1.1 min and decreased by 16.7 min in the selexipag and placebo groups (treatment difference [95% CI], 17.8 [-6.0, 41.6] min); mean time spent in MVPA increased by 0.3 min and was reduced by 2.0 min in the selexipag and placebo groups (treatment difference [95% CI], 2.3 [-10.8, 15.4] min); and mean number of daily steps decreased by 0.3 and 201.9 in the selexipag and placebo groups (treatment difference [95% CI], 201.6 [-243.0, 646.2]). INTERPRETATION: TRACE enrolled a prevalent population on background therapy and at low risk of disease progression. Changes in DLPA were small and highly variable, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. This patient-centric study was the first randomized trial in PAH to capture high-quality actigraphy data and to describe DLPA in terms of mean/median and variability, which may inform the design of future studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03078907; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.